Is One-year-old children in Dujiangyan City was a Mercedes, after grinding down the first run over, followed by Chengdu carrying a 10 year old son, the mother riding electric vehicles hit by a truck rolled into the vehicle, the driver in the reversing the wheel back and get people to move when activated, will be stuck in the right rear wheel on the spot in front of the boy crushed to death, while her mother was dying hh enterprises or parties to the accident the driver despite repeated claims that the reverse is to save people, but it seems Debu to the people's identity, according to TOM Online's 490 participants of a survey of Internet users, 88.78% of people think the purpose is to kill the driver reversing a child, and another 69.73% of people think that the current Road Traffic Act, lose up to 40 million dead, injured people may lose millions, sound, as well as the existing , but did not defect to induce people to kill; and the driver of this behavior choices, if you put aside the respect for life and the moral value of human nature, and so there is no binding requirement aside, just from the legal constraints that the minimum channel force is concerned, they will choose the next rational benefits or reduce The.
killed is lower than the compensation injured, is not entirely the fault of the law, our high health care costs, auto insurance and other social problems are not reasonable, the law led to the root causes of displacement ; The victims were killed by the second rolling, nor is it More importantly, system is China's nothing to do with the murder seems, can lenient sentence for a lenient sentence, major issues to minor ones, and this is serious disregard for the dignity of life.
good implementation of bad or inadequate implementation of the system may also become a system happen to them when they fell a height? That is because the behavior of ordinary people usually choose are based on the premise of self-interest, without prejudice to the self-interest or the basis for their own interests only when there are more altruistic behavior. Of course, a problem in the trouble, the self-serving behavior has become a would have been no accidents subjective Guyi of minor offenses, the reason evolution is a subjective Gu Yi Shun Jian-induced death of vicious crimes, one of the many reasons we may do a self-psychological analysis of the driver, the first driver in the accident will then mental blank and fameng, perceptual behavior choices; followed by The financial responsibility may be to determine the economic value of large, secondary grinding mill will engender the behavior of the victim. But most important incentive for psychological or subject to criminal penalties. While we can not expect every innocent driver can hit and run at large, as we can not expect to achieve one hundred percent detection rate as a criminal, but as long as more than half of the hit and run drivers are ultimately brought to justice, then the driver The reason will tell them that escape was not the best choice.
to analyze this reason, increasing the compensation of the victim's death is not the best solution, because if the old problem of Yan RCC is more If all the problems attributed to the system, not wrong, but the problem is we may only focus on the system design level, ignore the implementation of the system level, in fact, we Chinese do not lack anti-good system, that a lack of only the effective implementation of a good system, this is the crux of the problem.
expansion in a materialistic, utilitarian impetuous society where people respect the value of life, has given way to judge the value of the interest, the legal significance of Road is to use a bottom line to ensure the basic minimum of respect for the value of life, an effective implementation of the law, it can effectively avoid any possible errors should not be a loss to society, such a loss both for the victims life, and property rights infringement, in fact, includes the protection of the victimizers, if possible, the majesty of criminals out of fear rather than the implementation of the law violations, in fact, does not exactly make him suffer punishment from the law ; protect display, it should be limited deterrent effect, in turn, may become a catalyst for crime claims. Of course, law enforcement needs of the high social cost, but we do not pay this cost if today, tomorrow, will be paid more for this high social cost.
No comments:
Post a Comment